Saturday, December 31, 2011

My Pick of 2011


Best Movie (Hindi) - Soundtrack , which unfortunately hardly anyone saw.

Best Actor - A close one between Rajeev Khandelwal for Soundtrack and Shahid Kapoor for Mausam. Saif Ali Khan for Aarakshan comes in at a close third.

Best Actress
- Priyanka Chopra clear cut winner for 7 khoon maaf...

Supporting Role
- Soha Ali khan too did a commendable job in Soundtrack.

Best Soundtrack - Rockstar a clear winner, with Mausam a distant second.Th year was pathetic as far as music is concerned.


Playback singing -

Male - Vishal Bhardwaj for "Bekaraan" (7 khoon maaf) & Angaraag Mahanta for "Jiyein Kyun" (Dum Maaro Dum). Or Mohit Chauhan for "Tum Ho" (Rockstar)?? . Or Shahid Mallya for "rabba" (Mausam)? This is a tough one!!

Female - Sunidhi Chauhan for "Aa Zara" (Murder 2) & Neha Bhasin for "Dhunki" (Mere Brother Ki Dulhan)

Most Refreshing movie / Best new director
- Pyar ka punchnama - Luv Ranjan.

Song of the year
- No, not Kolaveri Di!!! Though popular vote would go with the sorts of Dhinka chika etc., but my vote would go for Tum Ho - Rockstar. Though radio airplay would uggest it to be Saibo from Shor in the City.

Best Firangi Maal
- I'm tempted to say Nargis fakri, but since I mean movies here, I would go with The Adventures of Tintin. Have not really seen any of those which make it to award ceremonies. Have only seen the likes of immortals, transformers, etc...


Band / Song of the year - Foster the people, Pumped up kicks.

TV show - Grey's Anatomy - especially the musical event of season 7.

Personality of the year
- Definitely, one man who took the nation by storm - Anna Hazare.

Feel free to give your opinions in the comments.....

Friday, December 30, 2011

Baby they build you up, only to tear you down....

The title of this post is taken from one of my favorite tracks "build you up" by Nelly Furtado. I couldn't think of better words to describe thhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gife state of two of the most iconic female public figures of our country, at least according to me. Sania Mirza and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan. Hence I was mildly (and pleasantly) surprised to see Sania being included in the Teachers' Achievement Awards Club on Star World.

Most people in India would know who Sania Mirza is, what her achievements are. But then, why this kolaveri against her, I say? People love to hate her, Now. That was not the case when she first burst on the scene winning the 2003 Wimbledon Championships Girls' Doubles title. She was still relatively unknown then, but it was a HUGE deal, that a girl from India was even playing tennis on the international level, leave alone winning stuff!! Till then, Paes and Bhupati were the only contemporary tennis players people and the media cared about. Come year 2005, and she was all over the place! Recipient of a wildcard at the Australian Open, owing to winning a prestigious ITF tournament the previous year, Sania surprised the world by reaching the third round, and giving a good fight to Serena Williams, no one less, before going down. She had announced her arrival on the big stage in grand style, even though she had already done India proud much before, winning a host of event in the Afro Asian games and mixed doubles at the 2002 Asian games.

2005 was a star marked year, full of iconic landmarks for her, being the first Indian woman to win a WTA tournament, shocking top 5 players like Svetlana Kuznetsova, whom she again encountered in one of the most engaging matches I have ever seen, on Wimbledon center court in 2nd round, before losing 7-5 in the final set. A leading expert who was commentating said, "Sania Mirza, remember that name. We're gonna hear a lot more of it". In that one year, where she broke her own record to become the first Indian woman to reach the fourth round at a grand slam at the U.S. Open, she went from being in the top 300 to the 31st ranked player in the world. This was a remarkable breakthrough year by any standards, earning her the "WTA newcomer of the year award".

2006 followed, with 3 medals including a silver at the Doha Asian games, top - 10 wins. 2007 saw her ranking peak at 27 in the world, and from playing qualifying and wildcards, she went on to being seeded at the Grand Slams. From then onwards, there was a sort of familiar pattern - occasionally showing up in finals, semifinals, or quarterfinals of tournaments, bowing out in the first or second round at most of them, and increasingly better performances in doubles events. Though she maintained a solid enough level to remain in the top 100. It was only in 2010, her worst year possibly on the tour, when she ended the tear outside the top 100 (166) since 2004. This is no fluke or minor achievement. Sustaining at the top level in tennis is no cakewalk. So many high profile cases of burnouts - Jelena Dokic, Justine Henin, Kim Clijsters - to name a few. This year, she has again shown some promise, with a top 10 ranking in doubles and making it to main draws of major tournaments.

But once the downfall began, people got bored. So did the media. OF course, there was no story in the first and second round appearances. So, there was a shift in the target. Always in the news for her "bold" image, she was hounded over the flag issue, her tee - shirts with quotes, her nose ring, her dwindling performances. So at a time when India was hosting two WTA tournaments - Sunfeast open, and the one in H'bad/Banglaore, she decided to quit playing tennis in India. Could you blame her? People saw the dwindling results, and instantly attributed them to her public appearances in fashion shows, television ads and other endorsement deals. Comments on youtube videos, or any article on her on the Internet, went from being rude to downright derogatory and insulting. Now, people Loved to hate her. These were the very people who filled a 5000 capacity stadium, with additional 15000 outside - 80% of them not even knowing what tennis is all about, when she won the WTA tournament in H'bad. They were telling her to quit tennis and join Bollywood, because that was where she belonged. Is it her fault or ours? A testimony to that would be a plain google search of her name, and the suggestions, reflecting the top searches would throw up words like Sania Mirza hot, blue film, and worse. It wasn't she who was going to Bollywood. It was we who wanted to see her there.

In a nation where the only understanding of tennis was that it got us the first, and the only one, solo event medal at the Olympics through Leander Paes, it was the advent of Sania Mirza on the scene that took it to new heights. I am not talking of the previous generation - the Amritraj brothers, Ramakrishnan and others.For this generation, sure, Paes and Bhupati were well known and respected, but their exploits did not inspire youngsters to pick up tennis rackets. Her's did. Parents did not start enrolling their 3, 4 year old kids in Tennis Academies till she came along. She was the first major female sports star of our country, well at least after P.T. Usha. She introduced India to tennis. Which is a big, big achievement. I do believe that her contribution to tennis in India has been the greatest of all, as she made it popular. No one saw or cared to the see the injuries behind the downfall. As soon as the results went down, she was immediately branded as a publicity seeking, money minded celebrity with no talent - a girl whose forehand has been constantly rated as one of the best by her peers including the Williams sisters.

No one cared for the fact that she went through debilitating injuries to her wrist and had 3 surgeries before she was even 25. She was forced to stay out for months, in 2008 and 2010 due to her surgeries. In her own words, she could not even hold a fork to eat, leave alone a tennis racket. The long lay offs, and the longer time it took to prepare for comebacks, led to a fall in rankings - and respect of the public. The final straw was her marrying Pakistani cricketer, Shoaib Malik. I was dismayed to read comments like traitor, and other unmentionable things by those very Indians who hailed her as the future of sport in our country. The brand endorsements were called distractions. No one gave a thought to the fact that it was those that paid for the constant traveling, training and other expenses in the most expensive sport, in absence of any financial support from government agencies. It's sad to see that on her profile pages or match reports, it is people from other nations who are cheering her on, showing belief in her abilities while most of the desi comments are about her marriage, being a traitor, playing for Pakistan, or doing advertisements.

Being an athlete in India is a double - edged sword. You will be treated like a God as long as you are winning, but your houses would be stoned if you lose. Even cricketers go through it. But No one has had it as bad as Sania, who through no fault of her own, has lost respect. But she still soldiers on, back in the top 65 for a while and in the top 100 in 2011, ready to battle it out in 2012 yet again,which hopefully, remains injury free and sees some better results.

First we showered her with a demi-god status and later pelted abuses, fatwas and insults. But she has braved it all, and deserves respect all the more for defying the extremists who ostracized her for wearing short clothes (demand of her sport), marrying a Pakistani national, playing doubles with an Israeli national. People say that she got the Padma Shri, India's fourth highest civilian honour, and Arjuna award too early. But according to me, there could not have been a more deserving candidate for these honours, than this middle class girl from a minority community, who introduced a cricket crazy nation to tennis, inspired youngsters ad gave them hope that an Indian too can compete at the top level and rub shoulders with the Williamses of the world, and beat the likes of Martina Hingis. So even if she may never win a grand slam, or another WTA tournament for that matter, she has, I think already done enough to be a path breaker, an icon to look up to and at least be respected, and not insulted on public forums. So hopefully, 2012 will be an exercise in reclamation for her, reclamation of the respect and her rightful place in the sporting elite of our country.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Fire in the Blood - Corporate Greed playing with millions of Lives

Note: All information in this article is derived from watching the documentary "Fire in the Blood" on Zoom TV.

Sunday afternoons can be quite difficult to go through, for the sheer lack of things to do, even after getting up at 2:00 pm. So as always, I turned to the usual resort, the Television today. While channel surfing, I came across something related to HIV -AIDS being aired on Zoom - India's equivalent of ET. The surprise value made me stay on initially, but soon, as the documentary progressed, all I felt was sheer horror at the apathy of the industry which at one point of time,I aspired to be a part of. I had no idea what the documentary was called, how much of it had already gone by, as there were no ad - breaks. It was only when it ended, I came to know that it is called "Fire in the Blood", listed on IMDB for a 2012 release (?????). To those of you reading the article, I can suggest that you either continue reading, or check out their website - http://www.fireintheblood.com/.

For those of us who have been subject to classes on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and Patents, the concept has been pitched as one which was introduced to protect the rights of tribal, indigenous populations, poor communities, and inventors in general, over their resources and creations. We were also given vague ideas about how, evil, corrupt multinational corporations used these patent laws to infringe on the rights of those very communities - case being in point the Basmati rice, turmeric etc. However, watching this documentary, you'd come to know that the gigantic scale of the greed of the most profitable business on earth - that of "saving lives" - the giant multinational pharmaceutical companies.

The basic crux of the documentary is the fact that how these multinational pharma companies arm-twisted the western governments, International bodies like the WHO, UNAIDS etc, to manipulated patent related legislation and trade agreements to prevent access to cheap, generic drugs, especially the Anti RetroVirals or ARVs to those countries which could not afford them - Africa, South America and certain pockets of Asia. More than 10 million people have died of AIDs and HIV, who could have in fact, been saved very easily, to lead longer, productive lives. Another startling fact, which made me proud of being an Indian, was that it was Cipla, an Indian company, headed by Yusuf Hamied, which has been at the forefront of providing these cheap, generic drugs to poorer African and other nations, and also providing the technical know-how on manufacturing them since the 70's. I have found a new idol in him, and I wonder why, in a country of hero - worshipers (cricket, Bollywood) such eminent personalities and their contributions not highlighted?? Or was it my own ignorance?

First, the basic facts - 90% of the pharma companies revenues come from just 10 -20 odd developed countries, with the United States of America accounting for 50% by itself. The entire continent of Africa accounts for just 1% - in other words, a market these companies can afford to ignore. of the top 500 fortune companies, the top 10 pharma companies (GSK, Pfizer, J & J etc) are more profitable than the other 490 companies combined. That gives a fair idea of the enormity of the money involved in this business.

The documentary features many people including an ex-CEO or something from Pfizer, a correspondent of the NY times who was instrumental in blowing the lid off this scam of gigantic proportions through his articles, an NGO worker from South Africa, doctors from India, Mr. Yusuf Hamied from Cipla himslef, an official from UNAIDS, Bill Clinton and many others, who reveal the hard - hitting truths behind this fiasco.

The cost of ARV therapy in the USA, and other countries, was more than $ 15000 per year in 2001. It still is so, in the USA at least. These costs, were unachievable for most people in any developing country, leave alone Africa. The giant pharma companies were just focused on the USA and other developed countries - the 90% of the market, which could afford to pay for them. As a result, in 2001 there were only 8000 people in the entire continent of Africa who could get these treatments. The others were diagnosed, if lucky, by hospitals, and then told to go home and wait to die. Somewhere down the line, Cipla, an Indian company manufacturing generic drugs, decided to provide ARV therapy drugs to the world at $800 per year ( as opposed to the nearly $800 per month prevalent then), at a global convention on access to cheap drugs, attended by heads of Governments, and the Pharma companies. Everyone was shaken, but not stirred. No one took up the offer. Ultimately, those fighting for the cause of access to cheap drugs for the poor world over did contact Mr. Hamied, and news spread fast and wide that it was possible to provide longer, fulfilling, productive, NORMAL lives to people in Africa, S. America and Asia too. He further agreed to cut production and other costs from the price, bringing it down to nearly $ 350, a dollar a day!!! This shook the very foundations of the pharma countries, which played all the dirty tricks in their books to keep the availability of such generic drugs at bay - from using patent laws, to launching mass advertising campaigns against "cheap, counterfeit drugs" from India.

Still, persistent efforts by NGOs, and individuals like Dr. Peter Mugyenyi from Uganda - who defied his country's patent laws to ship in cheap ARV drugs from Cipla, and facing arrest in the process, ultimately led to the inflow of generic drugs into Africa. The Governments ultimately relented, and now more than 6 million people in Africa, a number even higher than that of the USA, were availing of the ARV therapy, and leading, better, healthier lives. But the pharma companies' fear from the beginning, that once the American consumer learns that someone in Africa is getting the same drugs at $150 pa, for which they paid $15000 a year, they would want the same and their would be a backlash (which, never happened till now) made them turn a blind eye to social responsibility and ethics.

Till now they were manipulating the Western Governments and lobbying to keep generic drugs out of picture. Now they turned to the WTO (World Trade Organization), and at the Geneva Convention where TRIPS was adopted, it all fell apart. India too, along with other governments were signatory to an agreement which made it impossible to manufacture and market cheaper, generic drugs. The future generation of anti-AIDS and HIV drugs would be under these laws, protected by patents and laws, and the poorest of poor would again be denied the right to a healthy, productive life.

This is the basic gist of the documentary, though there is much more. But seeing the miraculous power of these drugs, I was shocked. They showed people who were born with HIV / AIDS, or acquired it at some point, and were nearly on the verge of death, in a day or two.... 11 year olds who looked like a 5 year old's skeleton, a man from Manipur who went underground at his home, isolated for three years after his diagnosis. All these lives were miraculously saved, the girl is now 16, healthy and working, the man became a body builder, was the silver medalist in Mr. India body building competition and went on to qualify for the Asian championships and is a celebrity of sorts. As the girl said "its the same for me, having a cure or having these medicines. I have an incurable disease, but I am taking these medicines, and I am alive."

I got into Bioinformatics / research with the naive notion of it being a gateway to the pharma industry, which I later realized with experience, was not true. But I still wanted to get into the drug development and discovery industry. Watching this documentary, I wonder where are the ethics, where are the morals, where is the greater motive of doing good for the society? As the ex-top notch guy from Pfizer said, its simple, the drug companies are there to make money, not to save the third world. The world surely could do with a few more Yusuf Hamieds.